Saturday, February 27, 2016

Marco's ACTUAL Record (Stop parroting the fools that say he never accomplished anything - you're embarrassing yourself)

First in Serving Florida:

After being elected to the Florida House of Representatives in 2000, and being selected as majority whip and then majority leader, Marco served as Speaker of the House in 2007 and 2008.
A few main points stand out about his tenure: He governed conservatively, he governed on new, conservative ideas, and he amassed an impressive record of accomplishment even during some tough years for the Florida economy.
Even while the Florida economy was slowing as the housing bubble ebbed, and Florida’s revenues dropped, Marco balanced the budget both years without raising taxes, and passed budgets with less spending than Governor Charlie Crist and the State Senate wanted.
As House Speaker, his pro-growth record earned him a 100 percent rating from the Florida Chamber of Commerce, and in 2006, he had a 100 percent rating from the National Federation of Independent Business. Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist said Marco as Speaker was “the most pro-taxpayer legislative leader in the country.”
Further, Marco explicitly campaigned for Speaker on a platform of ideas, laying out in a book 100 policy proposals that he gathered from meeting with Floridians across the state.
In the two years he had as term-limited speaker, Marco’s hard work turned many of these ideas into reality, improving how the government worked for Floridians on everything from education and health care to protecting their property rights or improving vehicle registration.

Here are just some of the ideas he made happen:

Eminent Domain

Just before Marco was speaker, when the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo vs. the City of New London formally gave governments nationwide the right to seize private property not just for infrastructure projects but also for any economic development project, Marco led the effort to curtail government’s eminent domain powers in Florida. He ran a bipartisan committee that examined how to stop governments from seizing property to hand over to private developers. He sponsored both a law and a constitutional amendment to prevent eminent domain abuse, and they both passed, earning the state an A grade from the Castle Coalition, which assesses states on their respect for property rights.

Higher Education

Marco has talked about the importance of supporting vocational education and college alternatives on the campaign trail, and his record on the issue stretches back to his time in the Florida House: He successfully saw through the creation of “career academies” to allow high schoolers to begin learning a trade, encouraged community colleges to focus on high-demand trades and majors, and made the transfer of credits between state higher education institutions easier.

K-12 Education

A number of education reforms from Marco’s 100 Ideas became law, including an expansion of the state’s school choice scholarship program that empowers parents, the promotion of new programs for gifted students, the creation of public-private partnerships for after-school programs and other school services, and easier access to virtual schooling. The House also passed a sweeping law to expand education opportunities for children with disabilities, and ultimately made law a bill focused on helping children with autism.
Two more 100 Ideas promises Marco made happen: He passed the legislation to raise Florida’s K-12 educational standards significantly, create a world-class curriculum without Washington’s involvement, and improve school measurement and accountability systems, and he helped create the Miami Children’s Initiative, a “children’s zone” first suggested in 100 Ideas and modeled after the highly successful Harlem Children’s Zone.

Small Government & Government Transparency

In 100 Ideas for Florida’s Future, Marco proposed the idea of a Legislative Sunset Advisory Committee for Florida, modeled on a committee in the Texas legislature, that would review laws on a regular basis for necessity and effectiveness — and he made it happen. In 100 Ideas Marco also championed the principle of transparency, following through on ideas like creating a public website to detail the state’s budget and requiring accountability for state-funded hospitals.

Crime

100 Ideas set forth a number of ideas to cut crime in Florida communities. Under Marco’s leadership, bills became law that registered sex offenders’ online identities, toughened penalties on repeat sex offenders, expanded efforts to collect DNA evidence from felons, and increased law-enforcement efforts and penalties for gang activity.

Executive Power

Marco stood up against Governor Charlie Crist’s executive overreach: The House blocked Crist’s unauthorized attempt to impose a liberal cap-and-trade scheme on Florida, and Marco stopped an unconstitutional Crist attempt to expand gambling in the state.
============================================
============================================
In the United States Senate:

1. Marco led the effort on the biggest Republican victory against ObamaCare.

Back in 2013, Marco sounded the alarm about the potential for the Obama Administration to bail out insurers losing money under ObamaCare.
He led the fight to make Congress block the Obama Administration from transferring taxpayer dollars to insurers losing money under ObamaCare. When those big losses started racking up, Marco’s work saved taxpayers $2.5 billion in one year alone.
This isn’t just about saving taxpayers the bailout money: The only way to keep ObamaCare afloat may be to subsidize the insurers who are losing money on it, and Marco has done more than anyone to stop that from happening. In fact, it’s the most important victory against ObamaCare that any Republican running for president has achieved.

2. Marco was behind the toughest part of the recent VA reform law.

Following revelations about deep corruption and incompetence at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Marco introduced a bill that would allow the firing of incompetent, negligent or corrupt VA managers. The bill, the VA Management Accountability Act, was adamantly opposed by government-union-friendly Democrats, including Senator Bernie Sanders.
Thanks to his work on VA issues, Marco was asked to be on the conference committee that put together the final VA reform legislation. There, he ensured that an important element of his VA Management Accountability Act — the ability to fire senior VA executives who aren’t doing their jobs — made it into the legislation that passed. McClatchy’s reported that Marco “played a vital role on a special committee that finalized that legislation.”

In four years as a U.S. Senator, Marco has built a record of accomplishments on some of the most important issues for conservatives.

Here are some of them:

Marco has continued to push for the accountability law to be implemented and has pushed to expand this authority so that any VA employee can be fired for poor performance, and will ensure as president that it becomes law.
Here’s what Pete Hegseth, a top veterans advocate who runs Concerned Veterans for America, has to say about Marco on veterans’ issues:
For the record, from someone who was there, Senator@marcorubio led the charge for  in the U.S. Senate.

3. Marco pushed new sanctions on Hezbollah, which are already beginning to bite.

In 2015, Marco led the successful effort to tighten the screws on the financing of the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah.
His legislation allows the U.S. to sanction foreign banks that are working with the group, which is waging war on Israel, killed 241 American servicemen in the 1983 Beirut Marine barracks bombings, and has carried out attacks on civilians around the world. AIPAC praised Marco and Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire’s leadership on the bill, calling it “an important tool against Iranian aggression.”
The good news: Hezbollah is already starting to feel the pinch, the Wall Street Journal reported recently. The group even called Marco’s bill “a new crime by American institutions against our people and nation.”

4. Marco fought the Obama White House to pass sanctions against Venezuela’s brutal socialist regime.

Marco has long been a leader on human rights issues, calling on the U.S. to stand up for people living under oppressive regimes, in Latin America especially.
In 2014, he led an effort to pass sanctions against the corrupt, anti-American government in Venezuela.
One of the problems in the way: The Obama White House was reluctant to take a stand against Venezuela. Marco felt differently, and, as McClatchy’s reported, “played a pivotal role in prodding the Obama administration on the matter – in a hearing, in multiple letters, in Senate speeches.”
At the end of 2014, Marco succeeded in passing the bill, and the White House has since sanctioned several individual Venezuelan government officials who’ve been responsible for human rights abuses.

5. Marco led the passage of the Girls Count Act, to combat human trafficking.

One of the most widespread human rights problems across the world is the way government policies and cultural norms undermine the rights of women and girls: many of them never counted at birth, depriving them of things like education and health care and making them much more vulnerable to human trafficking. The problem is greatest in the poorest countries, but it’s also a huge problem in China, with its horrific one-child policy (now “two child policy”).
Marco succeeded in passing a bipartisan bill, the Girls Count Act, seeing it through to becoming law, that would direct U.S. foreign aid resources toward protecting girls’ rights by addressing this problem.
The bill, supported by groups like Catholic Relief Services, means the U.S. will now help governments to properly register girls at birth and respect their rights under the rule of law, making it more likely that their rights will be respected.

6. Marco has defended religious freedom at home and abroad.

In the Senate, Marco has worked to protect one of our most fundamental liberties, the right to believe and live out those beliefs.
He has been at the forefront of the Congressional effort to reverse the Obama administration’s unconstitutional, anti-conscience HHS Mandate, authoring the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2012, and has championed the First Amendment Defense Act, which protects religious institutions’ ability to live by their values.
Marco has also made international religious freedom a foreign policy priority: He led the charge to reauthorize the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, has fought to highlight the oppression of religious minorities in China and elsewhere, especially Christians and others facing genocide in the Middle East at the hands of ISIS.

7. Marco has been a leading defender of Internet freedom.

In 2012, the Senate and House both unanimously approved Marco’s bill to oppose any international efforts to regulate the Internet, calling on the U.S. government to reinforce its commitment to Internet freedom by opposing efforts to cede Internet regulatory power to the International Telecommunications Union.
Thanks to the strong opposition Congress showed, no damaging regulatory measures were adopted at the World Conference on International Telecommunications.

Friday, February 19, 2016

Ted Cruz Speaking The Truth About Marco Rubio

Breaking News! Ted Cruz speaking the truth -- about Marco Rubio!

(For the record, this was 3 months after the Senate passed the Gang of 8 Bill, and 4 months after Cruz said he wanted comprehensive immigration to pass and bring the illegal immigrants "out of the shadows".)


Ted Cruz Sept. 24, 2013:
[Rubio] "is absolutely correct. I agree entirely…. Senator Rubio: You inspire me… Sen. Marco Rubio is a critical national leader …
"I don't know if there is any more effective, more articulate, more persuasive voice for Conservative principles than my friend Marco Rubio.
"Marco Rubio's story is the American story. ….One of the things I admire about Senator Rubio is how he views issues in this Senate."

Thanks Ted!

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4575293%2Fted-cruz-sept-24-2013-rubio-absolutely-correct-agree-entirely-sen-rubio-inspire-sen-marco-rubio 

Why Sen. Roberts of Kansas Endorses Marco Rubio

Reading WHY Roberts endorses Marco is more important than the fact that he endorses him. Read why. It's a very short article. Rubio can win the general election.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/269947-sen-roberts-endorses-rubio

Marco Rubio the Renaissance Man


There has been such a smear campaign on Marco Rubio, mostly revolving around immigration (he strongly favors securing the border, which surprises some who have listened to his opponents), that many people are missing the simple fact that he is a true Renaissance Man* of knowledge and solid ideas.
-----------------
*Ren·ais·sance man
Noun
"a person with many talents or areas of knowledge."
-----------------
He literally dwarfs the other candidates in his broad range of subjects ranging from student loans to national defense. Some areas that I don't believe the other candidates have even thought about, let alone have knowledge of.
If he could debate one-on-one on almost any subject with a single other candidate, he would literally embarrass them with the comparative knowledge on the subject, and the thinking that has gone into solving the problems on that subject.
He has been a solid and active Conservative for 15 years, but that's just the beginning.
Listen to him on STUDENT LOANS. This is a HUGE problem that no Republican is really even touching. He's got actual plans!
On NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE. He has more foreign policy experience than any other candidate, and it's reflected in knowledge and solutions, not just for ISIS, but obscure nations many reading this may not even have heard of. A wealth of knowledge and understanding.
On RACE RELATIONS. He really gets the real core of the problem, and what government can and cannot do. I believe he would bring our nation together like no one else could.
On THE ECONOMY. He really gets where jobs come from, the beauty of free-market economics, realistic tax reform, the killing effect of regulation on small business, the need for entitlement reform.
On THE FAMILY. Who else is really giving more than lip-service to the home, and would be a real model from the bully pulpit?
He blows away every other candidate. He would destroy Hillary in a general election debate. Without pulling punches, but without being mean.
Marco: "An American President needs to LOVE the American people, even those that don't love you back." (Wouldn't that be refreshing?)
This is a video of someone who I believe could be a truly great President of the Unites States.
Listen with an open mind to this latest Town Hall interview. He is not just a politician, but a political philosopher, a practical problem-solver, and (don't minimize this) a genuinely nice guy.
 

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Ted Cruz A Man Of Principle?

Introduction:

I've said often that I don't think Ted Cruz can win against Hillary. Mostly because of his bad tax plan and his cruel deportation plan.

Democrats never talk about his tax plan, because they know if he wins the Republican nomination, Hillary will skewer him like a shish-ka-bob over it.

(I won't digress here, but will write more about his tax plan later.)


Anti-"open borders" folks throw around the terms "amnesty" and "open borders" as cuss words against Marco Rubio, without ever defining them.  Most of them truly do not even understand what he advocates. But more importantly they don't understand the insidious horror that Ted Cruz is advocating.

He cloaks his deportation plan in the guise of "rule of law" and "breaking the law has consequences", but actually his plan activates the decimation of hundreds of thousands of families of, (yes, illegal) immigrants, through deportation, ignoring the U.S. citizenship of children born here of illegal immigrant parents, calling for the firing of immigrant employees and the disruption of the companies they work for, and harm to the economy throughout the shake-up shake-down.

And all because he must demonize bringing illegals "out of the shadows" to win this Republican nomination -- even though he is on record (and video) saying he SUPPORTED bringing them "out of the shadows" when working on George W. Bush's comprehensive immigration plan, and as recently as 2013, during the hearings on his amendment to the Gang of 8.

I've tried to avoid saying the following, because if Cruz were to get the nomination, I would certainly support him over Hillary Clinton, but I must say the following:


Ted Cruz has no problem being flatly, blatantly, obviously, and deliberately DISHONEST, in order to win the nomination and the Presidency.

This is very disappointing, as are some of his policy recommendations. But just as disappointing are his supporters, who seem to have their fingers in their ears, and their eyes closed, yelling, "La, la, la, la! I can't hear you!", whenever this obvious character defect of their candidate is brought up.

IMPORTANT SIDENOTE: The very fact that Ted hired his campaign manager, Jeff Coe, should make you wonder about Ted Cruz. Google "Jeff Coe" if you're interested. He is VERY well known as a sleazy lowlife campaigner. Ironically, he was the campaign manager for Ted's opponent in his Senate race, and put out a flyer accusing Ted of being unpatriotic because Ted had a client in private practice, which was a Chinese company convicted of stealing blueprints from an American company. Ted worked on the appeal to get the Chinese company off. It could have lost Ted his Senate race. It was an unfair smear against Ted, but he seems to have thought, "Wow! That's the kind of campaign manager I need. A takes-no-prisoners sleaze-bag!" And he hired Jeff Roe.

The Lies:

With that introduction, here is just a sampling of Cruz's dishonesty. This is only a sampling, mostly relevant to Marco Rubio, directly or indirectly (important, because I believe Rubio CAN beat Hillary). Cruz has also told several lies about what Donald Trump CURRENTLY advocates, by using outdated information on what Trump used to advocate. I haven't bothered with most of these, because I'm not supporting Trump, and personally don't believe Trump really believes much of what he currently advocates anyway.

These are in no particular order, and I may add more later, as "Updates". I've numbered them for reference purposes:





1. CRUZ SAYING RUBIO WANTED TO DRAFT WOMEN INTO COMBAT - LIE

Cruz: "It was striking that three different people on that stage came out in support of drafting women into combat in the military,"

Truth: Rubio said in that debate that he was good with women signing up with Selective Service, but elaborated by saying that he was in favor of a voluntary military, not a draft, and even if there was a draft, he opposed drafting women into combat against their will.

Cruz lied.

2. CRUZ SAYING HE NEVER SUPPORTED LEGALIZATION OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS - LIE

Cruz: [In the 2013 Gang of 8 amendment hearings]: They would still be eligible for legal status and indeed, under the terms of the bill, they would be eligible for LPR [Lawful Permanent Resident] status as well so that they are out of the shadows, which the proponents of this bill repeatedly point to as their principal objective, to provide a legal status for those who are here illegally to be out of the shadows.
And so I would urge people of good faith on both sides of the aisle if the objective is to pass common sense immigration reform that secures the borders, that improves legal immigration and that allows those who are here illegally to come in out of the shadows, then we should look for areas of bipartisan agreement and compromise to come together.
and so I would urge everyone on this committee to roll up our sleeves and fix the problem in a humane way that secures the border, gets serious about fixing that problem, that expands and improves legal immigration and that does not unfairly treat legal immigrants by removing a path to citizenship but allowing as this legislation does a legal status for those who are here illegally.

Truth: Cruz was either telling a lie in 2013, when he said he wanted comprehensive immigration reform and to legalize illegal immigrants, bringing them “out of the shadows”, or he is lying now, saying he never supported legalization.

Cruz lied.

3. CRUZ “APOLOGIZING” TO BEN CARSON, SAYING HIS CAMPAIGN ONLY PASSED ON WHAT CNN HAD ALREADY REPORTED – LIE

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/06/ted-cruz/ted-cruz-falsely-says-cnn-first-said-ben-carson-wa/

Bottom line: CNN reported that Carson was going to Florida the day after the debate, instead of New Hampshire (which was true). Cruz’s crew tweeted and emailed that Carson “will stop campaigning after Iowa”, and to go get Carson’s voters before they vote.

Cruz lied.

4. CRUZ SAYING THE HEALTH CARE PLANS OF TRUMP, HILLARY AND BERNIE ARE ALL IDENTICAL – LIE
I’m not going to spend any time defending Trump, because I don’t think he should be President, but the subject here is Cruz lying.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jan/31/ted-cruz/ted-cruzs-false-claim-trump-clinton-and-sanders-ha/

Bottom line: even Hillary’s and Bernie’s plans are far from identical, let alone Trump’s admittedly unclear plan, which is not single payer (like Bernie), not Obamacare (like Hillary), which he says he would repeal, and includes health savings accounts.

Cruz lied.

5. CRUZ SAYING RUBIO CALLED OBERGEFELL (SAME-SEX MARRIAGE) RULING “SETTLED LAW” – LIE
Cruz: Said Rubio said that the ruling “is the settled law of the land and we must … surrender and move on,”

Truth: Rubio specifically said (1) that it was NOT “settled law”, but could be changed, (2) that he was against it, and for man/woman marriage, (3) that marriage should be left to the States, (4) that he would appoint originalist Justices who would uphold the Constitution, since Obergefell was a bad decision, constitutionally.

Rubio did say (correctly) that for now, anyway, the Court decision is in effect the law of the land. This is not only true, but Ted Cruz knows it’s true, yet encouraged states to ignore the ruling.

(Reference http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/02/16/fact-check-cruz-distorts-rubios-stance-gay-marriage/80455074/# )

Cruz lied.

6. CRUZ IMPLYING THAT RUBIO WASN’T FULLY ON BOARD WITH DEFUNDING PLANNED PARENTHOOD - LIE
Rubio and Cruz were both co-sponsors on a bill from Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) to prohibit federal funding for Planned Parenthood. The legislation failed to advance when blocked by Democrats on a cloture vote.

So Cruz tried to get an amendment through that tied Planned Parenthood to the Iran Nuclear deal. It was such a non-starter that it failed in a voice vote, so there was not even a roll-call vote to put Senators on record. (Translation: it was a grand-standing move by Ted to look good.)

By the way, if it had passed (which again, it had NO chance of doing), it would have shut the government down, which would have quickly opened back up, and Planned Parenthood would still not be defunded, because a bill to do so would be vetoed by Obama. Stupid grandstand by Ted.

But Ted used that to say that Rubio did not want to use Congress’s “constitutional authority to defund Planned Parenthood."

Here’s what Bobby Jindal said about it: "Yesterday, Ted Cruz stood in front of hundreds of pro-life Christians and lied about Marco Rubio. Marco has always been passionately committed to the pro-life cause and has repeatedly voted to defund Planned Parenthood."

Cruz lied by implication.

7. CRUZ SAYING THAT RUBIO WOULD NOT RESCIND OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY ORDER

Cruz: Marco Rubio has gone on Univision and said in Spanish, ‘No, no, I wouldn’t rescind amnesty...'"

Even when Cruz technically tells the truth, he often lies by what he leaves out.

He has said repeatedly that Rubio told Univision, in an interview, that he would not rescind Obama’s amnesty order “on his first day in office”. Although this is technically true (regarding "first day"), it leaves out the parts where Rubio said that the Obama order “must go”, but that it couldn’t be done “immediately” because of the disruption for those who were already benefitting from it. (And that’s if a Court didn’t already get rid of Obama’s unconstitutional order).

Cruz’s charge implies clearly that Rubio wants to keep the order intact for good. A lie.

Cruz lied.

UPDATES (For sadly, I'm sure there will be some):

Monday, February 8, 2016

The Main Reason Hillary Would Beat Ted Cruz

There is an elephant in the room of the Ted Cruz campaign. And I don't mean the Republican mascot elephant.

The elephant is Ted's tax plan, and hardly anybody even mentions it.

They should mention it, and right away, before he has a serious chance of getting the Republican nomination, after which Hillary would kill him.

It's not because Ted's tax plan has no merit. It does. Economist Art Laffer ("The Laffer Curve") says it would stimulate the economy. It would, at least until it collapsed under the weight of its inability to raise enough revenue to meet the budget (while at the same time he wants a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution).

But even apart from Cruz's other "general election" weaknesses (for example, his "cruel" deportation plan and his irritating persona), his tax plan would virtually guarantee a victory for Hillary.

The basics of his tax plan are as follows:

1. A 10% flat tax on income (above basic living expenses).

2. A 16% flat tax (specifically a "subtraction-method" Value-added tax - VAT - on corporate profits.

3. No payroll tax (Social Security & Medicare).

There are the following specific problems with the plan, THAT HILLARY WOULD DEMOGOGUE INTO THE GROUND (successfully, in my opinion):

1. Roughly 70% of the American public is in favor of "progressive" income tax (where the more you make, the higher percentage of your income you pay in taxes).

In fact, some polls show that a majority of Americans actually think "the rich" should actually pay MORE than they do now.

One poll shows that among the top 1% of earners ($450,000 per year and above), even 60% of THEM think their taxes should be increased! Crazy, but true.

2. Hillary will shriek out two things about that (can you hear her voice?), and these will become the narrative mantras:

(a) "More trickle-down Economics! Don't the Republicans know this has failed?!!", and

(b) "More tax cuts for the RICH! The Republicans HATE you! Ted Cruz's plan will CRUSH you who are in the poor and middle class! While the rich get RICHER!

3. Even aside from the massive unpopularity of Ted's flat tax, some respected economists say his plan simply couldn't raise enough revenue, and we would be plunged into even worse deficits than we already have.

Hillary would play that for all it's worth, and make HER look like the pro-balanced-budget candidate! (A hilarious thought if it wasn't so tragic.)

Finally, the only defense Cruz would have against these serious charges would be some constant over and over technical mathematical philosophical explanation that 90% of voters would hardly comprehend, their eyes glazed over.

Marco Rubio has a decent tax plan (also praised by Art Laffer, by the way), and one that can win.





A Word from the Brilliant Andrew McCarthy - Rubio Was Right, Christie Was Wrong


This is a REALLY important article to counter the anti-Rubio media narrative going on.

Rubio Was Right, Christie Was Wrong

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/430961/rubio-right-christie-wrong-about-obama

Ted Cruz's Cruel Deportation Plan

In Saturday's debate, Ted Cruz trickily "slip-slided" past his cruel deportation plan. When people really knew the real substance of it, compassionate people will be appalled at the evil of it. Hillary (or whoever) will make sure to expose the horror, which is just one reason why Cruz can't win the general election. Go Marco!

Note: a questioner asked for clarification on that. Here's my response:

1. Cruz has dug in his heels, to say that under no circumstances would he have a path to legalization for current illegal immigrants.

2. That leaves two choices: (1) deport them, including those who were brought here as children, and parents of childr
en born here, who are U.S. citizens! This would entail huge problems with uprooting families, pulling people out of their jobs, and harming employers and the economy.

(2) The other choice is to simply leave them in an illegal state, never dealing with the problem at all. Cruz himself, in 2013, said he wanted to bring them "out of the shadows", meaning that they did not have to fear the law (i.e., legalize them). He now swears he never said that, even though we have it on video. I disrespect him for that weaseling, but what are you going to do?

In any case, he has chosen the first option, to deport them. A grown woman came to one of his rallies in Iowa, scared to death because she was brought here as a child, and asked Cruz if even she would be deported under the circumstances. His chilling answer, with no evident compassion at all, was, "Hey, breaking the law has consequences." I half expected him to handcuff her and then in turn her over to ICE authorities.

But he continues to criticize the boogeyman of "amnesty", using it as a cuss word, while hiding the real horror of his proposed plan.

(For the record, I completely agree with sealing the borders tight, before any legalization.)

Still Need Marco to Beat Hillary

The fundamentals remain the same:

1. Jeb Bush and Donald Trump are highly unpopular with large sections of the Republican electorate.

2. Christie and Kasich are too liberal for much of the Republican Primary Voters.

3. Ted Cruz has sky high personal negative ratings.

For that reason, Marco Rubio is still the only candidate that can unite the Republican Party and take us to Victory in 2016.

h/t Juan Genao

Christie's "Script" Hypocrisy

Bullying is not debating. This is the jealous bully figuratively poking his finger in Rubio's chest accusing Marco of being too "scripted".

At least Rubio's scripts reflect many years of consistent Conservatism, unlike Christie, who has been liberal on many things from guns to abortion, while acting Conservative for his Presidential run.
Go Marco!

The Shallow Cable Talking Heads - And The Shallowness of Listeners Who So Easily Buy Their Narrative

Disgusting how shallow the cable news talking heads are regarding Marco Rubio's mostly-excellent debate Saturday night.
Sorta like:
True point: "Rubio actually spoke about the importance of the Consitituion! Only one other candidate even mentioned it."
Shallow Talking Head: "That's not worth mentioning, did you hear him embarrass himself with that little repetitive script?"
True point: "Rubio gave a brilliant heartwarming explanation of Conservatism. 1. Limited Government, 2. Free Enterprise, 3. Strong National Defense. No one else even attempted to defend Conservatism as a political view."
Shallow Talking Head: "That's not worth mentioning, did you hear him embarrass himself with that little repetitive script?"
True point: "Rubio had a thorough and detailed plan for combatting ISIS, even in an informed smart back-and-forth with Marth Raddatz.
Shallow Talking Head: "That's not worth mentioning, did you hear him embarrass himself with that little repetitive script?"
True point: "Rubio defended the life of the unborn, stressing the importance of all lives, a view he has always held, while Jeb made the dumb statement that he (Jeb) is the MOST pro-life, yet accusing Rubio of being TOO pro-life."
Shallow Talking Head: "That's not worth mentioning, did you hear him embarrass himself with that little repetitive script?"
True point: "Rubio spoke of the future for our children, that they might inherit a great country. While Christie, for example blustered in attack mode because he's 3% in the polls."
Shallow Talking Head: "That's not worth mentioning, did you hear him embarrass himself with that little repetitive script?"
True point: "Rubio eloquently spoke of the importance of bringing the Republican Party together to beat Hillary, pointing out why she was not qualified to be President. No one else had that vision."
Shallow Talking Head: "That's not worth mentioning, did you hear him embarrass himself with that little repetitive script?"
You get the idea. And the shallow talking heads are rewarding lightweight Chris Christie for his own shallow bullying. -- Yes, I get the oxymoron of calling Chris a lightweight.:)